Zimbabwean vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chinese
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,334,661 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.093% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 93.3 Chinese.
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $77,465, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $116,156, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,804 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.64%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Average 25.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.0%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 47.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Excellent 30.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 37.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.93%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.7%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 21.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.5%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |