Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Chinese

Poor
Exceptional
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,573,440 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 81.2 Chinese.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $77,465, a difference of 48.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,138 compared to $116,156, a difference of 23.4%), and median household income ($80,357 compared to $98,496, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($53,503 compared to $56,872, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,812 compared to $48,836, a difference of 6.6%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 67.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 59.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.3%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.0%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 81.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 50.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 8.5%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 46.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.8%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 11.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.4%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.8%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 95.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresChinese
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%