Zimbabwean vs Romanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Romanians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Romanian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,528,220 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Romanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 62.7 Romanians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Romanian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $60,063, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and per capita income ($45,804 compared to $48,445, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($110,011 compared to $111,243, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $91,994, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $108,609, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanRomanian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$48,445
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$111,243
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$91,994
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$50,244
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$60,063
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Exceptional
$41,663
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$53,632
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$102,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$108,609
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$64,142
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
28.0%

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.6%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.34%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanRomanian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
16.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
15.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.4%

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanRomanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Good
17.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.96%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanRomanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Good
83.0%

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.61%), and family households (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.75%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanRomanian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 21.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanRomanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Average
55.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Fair
6.2%

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.0%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanRomanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.7%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
62.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
49.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
41.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Zimbabwean vs Romanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Romanian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.2%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Romanian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanRomanian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.4%