American vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,705,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.074. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Americans corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,527 compared to $77,465, a difference of 39.5%), median household income ($75,932 compared to $98,496, a difference of 29.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,536 compared to $116,156, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 7.5%), median male earnings ($50,761 compared to $56,872, a difference of 12.0%), and median earnings ($42,742 compared to $48,836, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (20.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 56.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 56.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and single father poverty (20.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (40.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.1%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (65.5% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.6%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.2%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and associate's degree (40.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between American and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 62.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 39.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.64%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%).