Filipino vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,256,733 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $56,872, a difference of 30.5%), per capita income ($59,066 compared to $46,098, a difference of 28.1%), and median earnings ($61,197 compared to $48,836, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $58,162, a difference of 0.73%), householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $77,465, a difference of 1.0%), and wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 32.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (24.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 21.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 31.6%), divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (51.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (65.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 27.9%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 94.6%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 69.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.2% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.37%), high school diploma (91.6% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.3%), ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.3%), and male disability (9.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%).