Swiss vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,375,698 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 67.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.7%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and median household income ($85,681 compared to $98,496, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $56,872, a difference of 2.1%), per capita income ($44,076 compared to $46,098, a difference of 4.6%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.5%), single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.74%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 61.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.45%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and married-couple households (49.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.1%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.8%), associate's degree (46.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and college, 1 year or more (59.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 43.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.45%).