Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Whites/Caucasians
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,863 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.248% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 2,248.0 Whites/Caucasians.
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $58,847, a difference of 11.9%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $82,029, a difference of 10.5%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $99,800, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,336, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $53,925, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,197, a difference of 6.7%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 28.5% |
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 19.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.1% |
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.3% |
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.72%), family households (64.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.4%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.090%), 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 1.8% |
Zimbabwean vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 41.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.7%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |