Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Honduras Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,972,226 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.171% in Immigrants from Honduras. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 171.4 Immigrants from Honduras.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $83,618, a difference of 31.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $82,697, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $77,328, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $48,267, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $34,647, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 80.1%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 65.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.6%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.5%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 37.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 35.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.36, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 83.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 66.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Honduras communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 20.1%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%).