Syrian vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Syrian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Syrians

Chinese

Good
Exceptional
7,975
SOCIAL INDEX
77.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
97th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Syrian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,100,979 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Syrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Syrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Syrians corresponds to an increase of 48.1 Chinese.
Syrian Integration in Chinese Communities

Syrian vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,494 compared to $77,465, a difference of 22.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,353 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($89,830 compared to $98,496, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,934 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.20%), per capita income ($46,837 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($40,727 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.8%).
Syrian vs Chinese Income
Income MetricSyrianChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,837
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,299
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,830
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,934
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,187
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,727
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,353
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,215
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$107,207
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,494
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.6%
Average
25.9%

Syrian vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.6%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 16.0%).
Syrian vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricSyrianChinese
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Good
13.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.8%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.3%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.6%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.8%

Syrian vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.7%).
Syrian vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSyrianChinese
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Syrian vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Syrian vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSyrianChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.6%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Exceptional
84.1%

Syrian vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.25%), currently married (47.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.7%).
Syrian vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSyrianChinese
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.8%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.6%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.5%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.2%
Excellent
30.2%

Syrian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.4%).
Syrian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSyrianChinese
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.5%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
8.8%

Syrian vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Syrian vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricSyrianChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.9%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.1%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
1.8%

Syrian vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Syrian vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricSyrianChinese
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Good
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%