Syrian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Syrian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Syrians
Chinese
7,975
SOCIAL INDEX
77.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
97th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Syrian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,100,979 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Syrian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Syrians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Syrians corresponds to an increase of 48.1 Chinese.
Syrian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($63,494 compared to $77,465, a difference of 22.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,353 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($89,830 compared to $98,496, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,934 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.20%), per capita income ($46,837 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($40,727 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,837 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $109,299 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,830 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,934 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,187 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,727 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,353 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,215 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $107,207 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,494 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.6% | Average 25.9% |
Syrian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.7%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.6%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 16.0%).
Poverty Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
Poverty | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Good 10.9% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Good 13.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Average 12.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.3% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Excellent 28.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Syrian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 48.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Syrian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Labor Participation Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Good 84.8% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Syrian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.25%), currently married (47.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Syrian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Syrian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.8%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.6%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.2% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.3% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Syrian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Syrian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Syrian | Chinese |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Average 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |