Zimbabwean vs Chippewa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,308,196 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.170% in Chippewa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 170.4 Chippewa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,618 compared to $70,539, a difference of 28.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $83,943, a difference of 27.3%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $86,852, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $47,015, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,003, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 54.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 54.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 81.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 60.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 48.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 39.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.030%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.2%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Chippewa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.79%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.0%).