Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Chinese
9,269
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
25th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from South Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,232,085 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.445% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to an increase of 444.5 Chinese.
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,234 compared to $77,465, a difference of 15.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $58,162, a difference of 12.5%), and per capita income ($51,465 compared to $46,098, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,286 compared to $116,188, a difference of 0.080%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,748 compared to $104,264, a difference of 1.4%), and median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,465 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,286 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,800 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,850 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,899 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,508 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,705 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,748 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,886 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,234 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 27.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.4%), and single female poverty (20.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.87%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 14.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Fair 74.9% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 84.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%), family households (63.7% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.9%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.8% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.5% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from South Africa vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.6%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.84%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Africa | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.3% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Fair 3.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |