Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Okinawan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Okinawans

Exceptional
Excellent
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,907
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
39th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Okinawan Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,337,769 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.058% in Okinawans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 57.8 Okinawans.
Zimbabwean Integration in Okinawan Communities

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $55,817, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $119,349, a difference of 21.1%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $67,232, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $54,701, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $70,846, a difference of 7.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Income
Income MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$55,817
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$129,979
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$106,624
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$57,550
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$67,232
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Exceptional
$46,905
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$54,701
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$119,349
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$124,796
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$70,846
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
28.1%

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 13.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.98%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
10.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
26.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
8.9%

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Good
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
32.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
72.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Good
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Good
83.0%

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 21.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
62.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
47.4%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
26.9%

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
14.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
86.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.5%

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 44.4%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 40.8%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
73.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
69.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
57.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
50.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
3.3%

Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Okinawan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.090%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanOkinawan
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
20.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%