Immigrants from Grenada vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,634,100 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.517% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 517.3 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 60.2%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $77,465, a difference of 52.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $116,156, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $48,836, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 99.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 96.8%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 90.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 9.6%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 60.4%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 53.6%), and unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 52.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 57.9%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 355.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 223.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 162.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 46.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 109.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 162.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 87.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 67.9%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.5%).