Zimbabwean vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,314,846 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.057% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 56.7 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $56,052, a difference of 9.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,766, a difference of 4.9%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $105,444, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $98,886, a difference of 0.30%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $90,261, a difference of 0.40%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $55,659, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.8%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.80%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 9.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.57%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.27%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.54%), disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.0%).