Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,785,098 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.882. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 83.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $77,465, a difference of 31.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,804 compared to $116,156, a difference of 22.5%), and median household income ($81,236 compared to $98,496, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $41,461, a difference of 5.5%), median earnings ($45,030 compared to $48,836, a difference of 8.5%), and median male earnings ($51,310 compared to $56,872, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 56.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 55.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 54.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 63.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and female unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 10.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 51.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.76%), family households (64.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 46.1%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.6%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and associate's degree (44.6% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.040%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 4.7%).