Irish vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,672 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Irish corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,097 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.8%), median household income ($86,145 compared to $98,496, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,317 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,464 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.72%), per capita income ($44,679 compared to $46,098, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($47,276 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 73.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.4%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.0%), associate's degree (46.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and college, 1 year or more (59.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Irish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 48.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.1%).