Soviet Union vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,259,583 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.274% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to an increase of 274.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($54,202 compared to $46,098, a difference of 17.6%), and median female earnings ($46,556 compared to $41,461, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($119,262 compared to $116,188, a difference of 2.6%), median household income ($95,098 compared to $98,496, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,008 compared to $116,156, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 59.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 50.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 22.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.0%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and family households (60.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.34%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and family households with children (24.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 112.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 99.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 11.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 68.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.1%), master's degree (20.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 40.9%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.6%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.28%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%).