Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Shoshone
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Shoshone
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,256
SOCIAL INDEX
20.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
264th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Shoshone Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,650,115 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.074% in Shoshone. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,073.9 Shoshone.
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $83,588, a difference of 27.8%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $87,872, a difference of 25.2%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $72,660, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $48,720, a difference of 5.2%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $47,930, a difference of 17.5%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $37,072 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $87,872 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $72,660 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $40,932 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $47,930 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $34,677 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $48,720 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $82,062 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $83,588 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $53,681 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Good 25.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 49.6%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 47.0%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 17.8%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 20.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 16.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 25.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 22.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Poor 12.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 79.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 74.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 39.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 79.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 23.0%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.39%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.9% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 35.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 37.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Fair 10.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Fair 89.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 24.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.2%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 59.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 38.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 29.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 11.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Shoshone Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Shoshone communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 41.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 38.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.92%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Shoshone |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 49.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.7% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |