Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,036,925 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $77,465, a difference of 35.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $116,156, a difference of 27.1%), and median household income ($78,682 compared to $98,496, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $41,461, a difference of 9.0%), median earnings ($43,998 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.0%), and median male earnings ($50,298 compared to $56,872, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 65.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 62.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 61.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.9%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.5%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple households (43.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 41.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 113.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and associate's degree (43.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.8%).