Zimbabwean vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,975,680 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.738. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.353% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 352.8 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $33,921, a difference of 35.0%), median household income ($90,618 compared to $67,792, a difference of 33.7%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $82,386, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $46,417, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,063, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 113.2%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 103.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 38.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 39.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 50.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 93.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 75.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.5%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.54%), family households (64.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.52, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 66.0%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 32.6%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.7%).