Zimbabwean vs Ugandan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,576,737 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.197% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 197.0 Ugandans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,177, a difference of 7.6%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $87,557, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,889, a difference of 0.22%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,923, a difference of 0.66%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,854, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.8%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.2%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.49%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 8.0%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.6%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and associate's degree (51.3% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.6%).