Immigrants from Korea vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,130,015 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,079 compared to $56,872, a difference of 14.4%), per capita income ($51,671 compared to $46,098, a difference of 12.1%), and median earnings ($54,530 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $116,156, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($55,716 compared to $58,162, a difference of 4.4%), and median household income ($102,962 compared to $98,496, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.47%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.1%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 0.98%), currently married (49.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 30.9%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.9%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.7%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 34.4%), ambulatory disability (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.7%), and male disability (9.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.7%).