Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Iroquois
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,796,119 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.211% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 211.3 Iroquois.
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $53,737, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $87,255, a difference of 22.5%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $74,279, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $36,408, a difference of 12.1%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Excellent 25.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 49.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 44.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 13.8%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 80.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.1% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 38.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 21.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Good 6.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.3%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Zimbabwean vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 37.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.81%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.1%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Iroquois |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.7% |