New Zealander vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,398,916 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.099% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 99.4 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $77,465, a difference of 15.0%), per capita income ($50,575 compared to $46,098, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $58,162, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.79%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $116,188, a difference of 0.83%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $41,461, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 34.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 32.5%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.98%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.8%), family households (62.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.34%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.4%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.1%).