Scottish vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,770,727 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.248% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 248.1 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $77,465, a difference of 25.5%), median household income ($85,101 compared to $98,496, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $58,162, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.9%), per capita income ($44,440 compared to $46,098, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 70.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.4%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.2% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.3%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.43%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 4.2%).