Immigrants from Central America vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,424,273 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $77,465, a difference of 45.0%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $116,188, a difference of 36.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $116,156, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $41,461, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 103.8%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 86.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 79.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.8%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.0%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 52.1%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.79%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 145.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.5%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.2%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.5%).