Zimbabwean vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,592,747 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.125% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 124.9 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $49,152, a difference of 34.0%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $84,981, a difference of 29.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $86,301, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,655, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $34,942, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 92.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 67.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 21.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 37.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.3%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.58%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 65.0%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.8%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.0%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%).