Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Guatemala Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,648,569 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guatemala within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.097% in Immigrants from Guatemala. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 97.1 Immigrants from Guatemala.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $87,191, a difference of 26.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $86,573, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $53,950, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,447, a difference of 0.37%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,444, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 76.2%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 54.5%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.82%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.3%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 30.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Guatemala communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.7%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%).