Cuban vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cuban
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cubans
Chinese
3,662
SOCIAL INDEX
34.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
213th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Cuban Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,534,345 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Chinese.
Cuban vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $77,465, a difference of 57.6%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $116,188, a difference of 36.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $116,156, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $41,461, a difference of 18.7%).
Income Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,383 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $84,981 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,392 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,619 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,580 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,942 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,655 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,483 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,301 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,152 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.3% | Average 25.9% |
Cuban vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 97.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 93.2%), and receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.3%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.4%).
Poverty Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.2% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.6% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 18.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Cuban vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cuban vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.91%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.5% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Cuban vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 39.5%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.7% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 0.58%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Poor 27.1% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.6% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
Cuban vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 48.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Cuban vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.6% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Fair 1.8% |
Cuban vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.3%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.66%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.7%).
Disability Metric | Cuban | Chinese |
Disability | Average 11.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |