Zimbabwean vs Canadian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,318,792 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Canadians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Canadians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 29.2 Canadians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,230, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $87,769, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,858, a difference of 0.12%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,911, a difference of 0.66%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,625, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 16.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.97%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 11.3%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.61%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.1%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Canadian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.3%).