Zimbabwean vs Celtic Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Celtic
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Celtics
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Celtic Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,253,964 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.561. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Celtics. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 53.3 Celtics.
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($90,618 compared to $83,193, a difference of 8.9%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $101,139, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $60,608, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,447, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $54,242, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Average $43,621 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Fair $101,139 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Fair $83,193 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Fair $45,732 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Average $54,242 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $38,283 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $50,447 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Fair $92,241 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Fair $98,896 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Average $60,608 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 24.5%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Fair 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Average 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 10.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.5%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 81.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.1%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 92.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Exceptional 21.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.5%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Exceptional 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Good 65.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Average 14.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Good 1.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Celtic Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Celtic communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 12.5%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Celtic |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Average 47.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |