Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,453,799 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.254% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 254.3 Immigrants from Central America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $34,974, a difference of 31.0%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $85,050, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $85,965, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,022, a difference of 0.47%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $33,953, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 82.1%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 58.2%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 31.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 15.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 109.1%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 91.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.20%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.92%).