Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nigerian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Nigerians

Exceptional
Poor
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nigerian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,923,106 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.641% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 641.5 Nigerians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Nigerian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.6%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $97,522, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $87,730, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $39,641, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $49,416, a difference of 3.7%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,532, a difference of 5.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanNigerian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$41,026
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$97,522
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Poor
$81,725
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$52,039
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Average
$39,641
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$49,416
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$87,730
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$95,492
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Poor
$58,992
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
23.0%

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 38.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.16%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanNigerian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanNigerian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanNigerian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Average
82.7%

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.4%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.31%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanNigerian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
43.2%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
35.3%

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 3.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 8.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanNigerian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Poor
6.0%

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.7%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanNigerian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Average
14.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
1.8%

Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.8%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Nigerian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanNigerian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Good
2.4%