Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Mexico Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,218,728 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.283% in Immigrants from Mexico. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 282.7 Immigrants from Mexico.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $33,931, a difference of 35.0%), median family income ($110,011 compared to $83,639, a difference of 31.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $84,910, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $50,422, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $33,236, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 85.7%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 59.9%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.93%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 39.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 110.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 105.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 96.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Mexico communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.87%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%).