Zimbabwean vs Cajun Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Cajun
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Cajuns
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,029
SOCIAL INDEX
17.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
275th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cajun Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,021,288 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 95.6 Cajuns.
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 28.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $83,015, a difference of 28.7%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $70,605, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $52,325, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,338, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $42,189, a difference of 14.3%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $37,527 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $87,157 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $70,605 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $42,189 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Poor $52,325 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $34,034 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $45,338 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $82,393 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $83,015 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $51,397 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 33.9% |
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 71.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 58.8%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 25.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 25.8%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.9% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 25.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 24.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 22.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 22.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 19.1% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 30.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 40.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 43.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 78.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 42.8%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.24%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.82%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Excellent 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Average 46.4% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Tragic 3.17 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 41.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 0.72%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 5.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Exceptional 57.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 61.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 89.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 87.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 82.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 57.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 37.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 29.6% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Cajun Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 46.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.2%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Cajun |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 14.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 50.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 7.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.9% |