Turkish vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,321,467 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 222.9 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $77,465, a difference of 13.9%), per capita income ($52,391 compared to $46,098, a difference of 13.7%), and median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $56,872, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($99,389 compared to $98,496, a difference of 0.91%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $116,188, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 10.2%), family households (63.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.0%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.1%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.8%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.4%), and male disability (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.83%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.2%).