Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Taiwanese

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,407,870 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to a decrease of 25.4 Taiwanese.
Zimbabwean Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,894, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $101,492, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,576, a difference of 0.55%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,902, a difference of 0.68%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $89,900, a difference of 0.80%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Excellent
25.1%

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.49%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.60%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.97%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
29.0%

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.0%

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 44.2%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%

Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.79%).
Zimbabwean vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanTaiwanese
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%