Zimbabwean vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,263,939 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.109% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 108.8 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 10.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,244, a difference of 7.5%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $86,164, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,421, a difference of 0.32%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.43%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,221, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and single female poverty (19.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.090%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.4%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and male disability (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 5.3%).