Aleut vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Aleut
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Aleuts
Chinese
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Aleut Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,293,519 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Aleut communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Aleuts within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Aleuts corresponds to an increase of 14.1 Chinese.
Aleut vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,708 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.5%), median household income ($83,446 compared to $98,496, a difference of 18.0%), and median family income ($98,702 compared to $116,188, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,719 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and per capita income ($42,210 compared to $46,098, a difference of 9.2%).
Income Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,210 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Poor $98,702 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,446 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,241 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,168 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,719 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,377 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,370 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $100,052 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,708 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.7% | Average 25.9% |
Aleut vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (25.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 57.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 55.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.7%).
Poverty Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
Poverty | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.3% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Poor 17.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Aleut vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 73.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 69.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.2% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Aleut vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 79.0% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.4% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Aleut vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.4%), single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 39.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Aleut vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 18.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.2% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Aleut vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 23.5%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and bachelor's degree (31.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.4% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.6% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Aleut vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Aleut and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 34.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (28.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 31.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Disability Metric | Aleut | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.6% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |