Kiowa vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,331,600 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $116,156, a difference of 55.3%), householder income over 65 years ($51,140 compared to $77,465, a difference of 51.5%), and median household income ($65,914 compared to $98,496, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 9.7%), median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $41,461, a difference of 21.7%), and median earnings ($39,232 compared to $48,836, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (23.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 91.9%), family poverty (12.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 88.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (24.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 87.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.0%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and single father poverty (22.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 57.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 42.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.4%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.34, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (61.4% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 42.1%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 40.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.7%), master's degree (10.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 68.6%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (54.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 11.3%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.5%).