Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hungarian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Hungarians

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hungarian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,442,537 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 21.1 Hungarians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Hungarian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $61,673, a difference of 6.8%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $86,920, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,804 compared to $45,426, a difference of 0.83%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $47,795, a difference of 0.91%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $97,544, a difference of 1.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanHungarian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Excellent
$45,426
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Excellent
$105,609
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Good
$86,920
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Excellent
$47,795
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$57,309
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Average
$39,510
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$50,247
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Excellent
$97,544
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Excellent
$103,913
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Good
$61,673
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
29.0%

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.92%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanHungarian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Good
8.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Average
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Good
13.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Poor
14.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Poor
17.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Average
16.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Average
16.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Average
16.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Fair
21.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
29.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanHungarian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Good
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Average
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Fair
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanHungarian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
63.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
39.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Exceptional
76.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Fair
82.7%

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 8.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanHungarian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
49.1%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Good
31.2%

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanHungarian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Excellent
56.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Good
19.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Good
6.4%

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.5%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 13.9%), and bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.17%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanHungarian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
95.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Average
46.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Good
38.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Good
15.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Hungarian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanHungarian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.5%