Jamaican vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,723,368 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Jamaican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jamaicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jamaicans corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,560 compared to $77,465, a difference of 42.0%), wage/income gap (19.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 32.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,327 compared to $116,156, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,670 compared to $41,461, a difference of 7.2%), median earnings ($43,343 compared to $48,836, a difference of 12.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,929 compared to $58,162, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (11.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 70.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 68.1%), and receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.5%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 60.0%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 59.7%), births to unmarried women (38.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (64.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 118.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 91.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.1% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 11.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 56.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 63.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jamaican and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.54%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.1%).