Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Australia
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Australia
Chinese
8,900
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
40th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Australia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,955,729 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.153. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Chinese.
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $46,098, a difference of 25.7%), median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $56,872, a difference of 18.9%), and median earnings ($56,305 compared to $48,836, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $58,162, a difference of 2.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,308 compared to $116,156, a difference of 2.7%), and median household income ($102,562 compared to $98,496, a difference of 4.1%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $57,953 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $126,620 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $102,562 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $56,305 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $67,634 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,573 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $56,660 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $115,947 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $119,308 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $69,164 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.2% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 35.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.78%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.0% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.1% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.6%), family households (61.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.030%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.70%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.3% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.6% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 68.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 32.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.4% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 58.7%), professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 54.7%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.6% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.7% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.8% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.9% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.9% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Australia vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.0%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Australia | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |