Burmese vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,970,838 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $56,872, a difference of 14.7%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $46,098, a difference of 12.8%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $116,156, a difference of 4.5%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $98,496, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.41%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 14.7%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.8% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (48.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 29.7%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.3%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.7%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 31.4%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.6%).