Czech vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Chinese
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,554,451 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 57.3 Chinese.
Czech vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.5%), median household income ($86,164 compared to $98,496, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $58,162, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.58%), per capita income ($44,595 compared to $46,098, a difference of 3.4%), and median earnings ($47,221 compared to $48,836, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Czech | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Average 25.9% |
Czech vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 30.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.2%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Czech vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 64.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.84%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Chinese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Czech vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Czech vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.34, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.72%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Chinese |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Czech vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 6.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Czech vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 6.9%), associate's degree (47.2% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and college, 1 year or more (60.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Fair 1.8% |
Czech vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Chinese |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |