Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Soviet Union
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Soviet Union

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Soviet Union Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,011,281 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.356% in Soviet Union. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 356.3 Soviet Union.
Zimbabwean Integration in Soviet Union Communities

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $54,202, a difference of 18.3%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $46,556, a difference of 14.1%), and median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $63,382, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $62,848, a difference of 4.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $112,008, a difference of 4.8%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $95,098, a difference of 4.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Exceptional
$54,202
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$119,262
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$95,098
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$54,290
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Exceptional
$63,382
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Exceptional
$46,556
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$55,340
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$108,457
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$112,008
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Excellent
$62,848
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
24.2%

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
11.1%

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.95%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Average
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
72.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Good
83.0%

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.5%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
60.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
24.8%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Fair
46.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
26.3%

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 92.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 10.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 42.9%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
17.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Tragic
82.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
45.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
14.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
4.4%

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.3%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.0% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Exceptional
71.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Exceptional
66.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Exceptional
55.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Exceptional
47.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
20.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.5%

Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Soviet Union communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 24.4%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.80%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
Zimbabwean vs Soviet Union Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSoviet Union
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
0.95%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.5%