Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,998,552 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 28.4 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 36.1%), householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $55,598, a difference of 18.4%), and median family income ($110,011 compared to $93,988, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,895, a difference of 0.24%), householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $52,437, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $45,729, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 66.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 55.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 43.7%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 28.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 71.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.17%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.33, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 172.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 56.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 42.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 51.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 53.9%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 52.5%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.95%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.6%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.0%).