Zimbabwean vs Pima Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,515,571 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.297% in Pima. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 296.8 Pima.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $30,644, a difference of 49.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $73,365, a difference of 45.6%), and median household income ($90,618 compared to $63,262, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $51,503, a difference of 0.48%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,326, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $82,821, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 179.6%), family poverty (7.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 135.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 116.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 38.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 39.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 172.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 127.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 118.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 57.4%, a difference of 17.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 88.9%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 79.4%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 56.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 5.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 91.6%), bachelor's degree (43.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 86.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 72.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Pima communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 79.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 69.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.2%).