Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bahamian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Bahamians

Exceptional
Tragic
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bahamian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,926,780 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Bahamians.
Zimbabwean Integration in Bahamian Communities

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $82,631, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $81,369, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $75,395, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,743, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,125, a difference of 16.2%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $39,735, a difference of 21.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Income
Income MetricZimbabweanBahamian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Tragic
$36,427
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Tragic
$82,631
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Tragic
$69,726
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Tragic
$39,735
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Tragic
$44,756
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Tragic
$35,125
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Tragic
$45,743
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Tragic
$75,395
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Tragic
$81,369
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Tragic
$51,000
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Exceptional
20.2%

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 79.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 62.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.7%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 12.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanBahamian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
16.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Tragic
21.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
14.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
17.0%

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.2%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanBahamian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.6%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanBahamian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Tragic
64.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Tragic
78.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
82.2%

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanBahamian
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
26.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
40.5%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.28
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Tragic
8.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
41.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
40.8%

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.91%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.1%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanBahamian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Tragic
51.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.1%

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.3%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanBahamian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Poor
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
91.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Tragic
60.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Tragic
41.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
32.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
12.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.4%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.090%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanBahamian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
24.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%