Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Bahamian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Zimbabweans
Bahamians
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
919
SOCIAL INDEX
6.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
334th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bahamian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,926,780 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bahamians within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Bahamians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Bahamians.
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($110,011 compared to $82,631, a difference of 33.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $81,369, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $75,395, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $45,743, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $35,125, a difference of 16.2%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $39,735, a difference of 21.4%).
Income Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,804 | Tragic $36,427 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $110,011 | Tragic $82,631 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,618 | Tragic $69,726 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,229 | Tragic $39,735 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,302 | Tragic $44,756 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,798 | Tragic $35,125 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,259 | Tragic $45,743 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $98,586 | Tragic $75,395 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,849 | Tragic $81,369 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,854 | Tragic $51,000 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 79.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 62.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.7%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 12.1%).
Poverty Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 16.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 21.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 18.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 31.3% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Females | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 11.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.3% | Tragic 64.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.0% | Tragic 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.7% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Fair 84.5% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 26.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 40.5% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 41.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.7% | Tragic 40.8% |
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 26.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.91%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.0% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.3%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 43.0%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Education Level Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Poor 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.9% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 87.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.2% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.3% | Tragic 41.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Tragic 32.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Zimbabwean vs Bahamian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Bahamian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.4%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.090%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Zimbabwean | Bahamian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.4% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.5% | Tragic 24.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.1% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |