Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sri Lankan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Zimbabweans

Sri Lankans

Exceptional
Good
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,460
SOCIAL INDEX
72.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
116th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sri Lankan Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,834,547 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.119% in Sri Lankans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 1,118.8 Sri Lankans.
Zimbabwean Integration in Sri Lankan Communities

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,259 compared to $55,470, a difference of 8.2%), per capita income ($45,804 compared to $44,014, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,586 compared to $101,960, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $56,136, a difference of 0.29%), median earnings ($48,229 compared to $48,040, a difference of 0.39%), and median female earnings ($40,798 compared to $40,496, a difference of 0.74%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Income
Income MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,804
Average
$44,014
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$110,011
Exceptional
$108,234
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,618
Exceptional
$93,093
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,229
Exceptional
$48,040
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,302
Excellent
$56,136
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,798
Excellent
$40,496
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,259
Exceptional
$55,470
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,586
Exceptional
$101,960
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,849
Exceptional
$108,270
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,854
Exceptional
$64,201
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Average
25.8%

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.4%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single female poverty (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Poverty
Poverty MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.4%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
26.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.6%

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.2%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.95%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.3%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.0%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.5%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Exceptional
83.2%

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.4%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households (64.1% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.68%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Exceptional
67.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
29.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
49.0%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Exceptional
3.35
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.1%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Excellent
47.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.9%

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 30.4%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.3%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Exceptional
92.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.2%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
23.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
8.4%

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 76.4%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Education Level
Education Level MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
93.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
91.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Tragic
90.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
89.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
84.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Average
65.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.2%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.3%
Average
46.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Average
38.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Good
1.9%

Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Sri Lankan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.40%), disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.87%).
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Disability
Disability MetricZimbabweanSri Lankan
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Good
23.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.1%
Tragic
48.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Excellent
2.4%